Log in

No account? Create an account
April 2012   01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30

It's a fair question- is she really that stupid?

Posted on 2010.09.22 at 15:29

Pensito Review » Christine O’Donnell Says Govt ‘Czars’ Are Unconstitutional – Is She Really That Stupid?

Was she being flip? Was it a joke that fell flat? Could she be that stupid?


Cleopatra Brimstone
paper_crystals at 2010-09-22 19:56 (UTC) (Link)
*cue In Russia joke*
suzermagoozer at 2010-09-22 20:03 (UTC) (Link)

in soviet russia...JOKE FLIPS YOU!
suzermagoozer at 2010-09-22 20:03 (UTC) (Link)
i think she really IS that stupid.

this woman was going off on the republican gubernatorial candidate who lost the primary and is running as a 3rd party candidate.

um...o'donnell has done that herself at least once in the five times she has tried to run.
jonnymoon at 2010-09-23 17:03 (UTC) (Link)
And win.

But I tell you true...we'd be better off with her than her Marxist opponent.
theservant at 2010-09-23 17:08 (UTC) (Link)
Marxist... you watch too much Fox.
(Anonymous) at 2010-09-23 19:04 (UTC) (Link)
Oh, ok, as opposed to being worried that someone had a boyfriend who dabbled in Wicca? Or that someone made the assertion that you should always tell the truth? Are these really critical issues to an election? Howabout when she stuck with her moral values and said that masturbation was bad, because it indicated lust in your heart...a bad thing, according to Christianity.
She was excoriated for these, yet her opponent, an avowed Marxist, was given a pass? Do you seriously not see how you're watching the new Pravda? Communist's News Network? BS-NBC?
This is the same attitude that allowed that incompetent boob in the whitehouse to get elected. Everyone ignored his connections to Reverend Wright (racist) or Tony Rezko (crook) or Bill Ayers (terrist). Nobody knew anything about Obozo when he ran, and that's because everyone was taken in by the misdirection of CNN And BS-NBC, trying to draw your attention away from the fact that he was a racist who hung around with crooks and domestic terrorists.
But liberal progressives everywhere seem to ignore that, it's like they're wearing blinders...all they see is what CNN tells them.
theservant at 2010-09-23 22:34 (UTC) (Link)
No, it's about worrying that she has kooky values and no qualifications. The Marxist thing is total BS. Everyone knew all that about Obama, they just knew that it was bullshit, no connection to anything, it didn't MEAN anything.
The fact that O'Donnel has been misusing campaign funds is a serious matter.
jonnymoon at 2010-09-29 20:14 (UTC) (Link)
Obama did have connections with Bill Ayers, that's not BS, it's a fact. Bill Ayers was a domestic terrorist, he is still not repentant and in fact has stated he wished he'd gone further, that's not BS, it is a fact.
Obama sat in Reverend Wright's church for YEARS, that's not BS, it's a fact. Reverend Wright's sermons are a combination of racism and anti-Americanism, that's not BS, it's a fact.
Obama's dealings (and his wife's) with Tony Rezko are not BS, they are known and documented...they are fact. Tony Rezko has been brought up on charges more than once, he is a criminal...that's not BS, it is a fact.
The leftist, liberal, mainstream media totally ignored all of these facts, and that in itself is a fact...the leftist, liberal, mainstream media did their best to keep our attention focused on his opponent so that nobody asked any questions about Obozo, that is not BS, that's a fact. Nobody knew what he was when he got elected...just that he peddled "Hope" and "Change" like any other politician...he was black, so he should be able to "heal the hurt", right? Except since he's been elected, I have heard the insult "racist" more than ever before in my 45 years that I've been alive. Obozo HAD no qualifications to be president; Hillary (murderer that she is) had more, and her only qualifications were "First Lady"...even PALIN (as a former governor) was more qualified...and that is a fact.
"Everyone" didn't "knew all that" about Obozo...that is a fact, and to this day, some people still are ignorant of all the powerful corrupt connections that Obozo has...another fact. For instance, his connections with Andy Stern, or George Soros. Can you tell me the nature of those? I doubt it.
What we know about Chris Coons--yet another fact--is that this guy claimed himself to be the "Bearded Marxist" of his friends in his political views, and even if he's not a "bona fide" Marxist, claiming yourself to be Marxist is a deal-killer...more than enough reason, when compared to O'Donnell, to vote for the non-Marxist.
If you have further facts about how ODonnel "misused" campaign funds, I'd love to hear them. Oh, and don't bother giving me "HuffingtonPuffington Post" or "Move-On.org" nonsense. They don't print fact, they print slanted journalism and hearsay...most of it colored by their leftist, socialist or communist agenda. I'm looking for FACTS here...(as opposed to some people.)
*sigh* What a shame. You know, I thought there might be a glimmer of comprehension, that you might actually have noticed how right I am...but no, you just continue to defend that joke who's sitting in the Whitehouse, and you continue to regurgitate the propoganda put forth by PMS-NBC, and Communists' News Network. I feel sorry for you, actually...you voted Democrat, but they screwed you right along with the rest of us. Well, at least you are blissfully ignorant of it.

jonnymoon at 2010-10-04 19:14 (UTC) (Link)
What, no reply? No chit-chat? No further "It don't mean nothing" witty repartes?
theservant at 2010-10-04 19:51 (UTC) (Link)
It's kind of off topic, and you already said you wouldn't listen to MSM sources. Further statements by the candidate have revealed her to be, in fact, that stupid.
jonnymoon at 2010-10-04 20:26 (UTC) (Link)
Ah, so you choose to continue insulting the canidate instead of refuting my points about how indeed, Obama associates with terrorists, racists, and criminals? ...by hiding behind, "It's off topic?" Inded, the entire premise was that anything is better than a Marxist and that the media seems to be giving said Marxist a pass, just like they gave to Obozo....but if you want to hide...

I expected better of you...but then, you do seem to lean to the left, so why should I?

I accept your forfeit. Again. Just like every other liberal...you (plural) really don't have a valid point, all you have is the card houses that the liberal media gives you to repeat.
theservant at 2010-10-04 20:31 (UTC) (Link)
If you read the article, you would understand that he isn't a marxist. If you looked at his record, you would understand that as well. Do you know what a marxist is?

And for you to accuse me of insulting candidates is kind of silly. Glass houses much?
jonnymoon at 2010-10-04 21:45 (UTC) (Link)
And again, you ignore the parallels.

It's ok, I've already accepted your defeat, you should too.

Regarding whether or not he's a Marxist, if it looks like a duck, if it quacks like a duck, if it espouses redistribution of wealth from those who create jobs to those who just create more mouths to feed, then it's a Marxist.

Perhaps you would be so kind as to show me where he has proven he's not a Marxist? Perhaps you can show me something to prove that Harry Reid never called him his "pet" (there's your Kiss of Death...if Prince Harry calls him his pet, that's enough reason to RUN).

And again, no propoganda sites. As always, I need real journalism...The Onion and Jon Stewart, or CNN, MS-NBC or MoveOn.Org are all the same.
Previous Entry  Next Entry